Flutamide (Eulexin) vs Other Anti‑Androgen Drugs: Full Comparison

Flutamide (Eulexin) vs Other Anti‑Androgen Drugs: Full Comparison

Anti-Androgen Drug Comparison Tool

Flutamide (Eulexin)

Non-steroidal anti-androgen, 250mg three times daily. Effective but associated with higher liver toxicity risk.

Liver Risk
Bicalutamide (Casodex)

Once-daily dosing with milder side effect profile. Preferred first-line option due to convenience and safety.

Convenience
Enzalutamide

Third-generation AR blocker with strong tumor control. Higher cost and potential CNS side effects.

High Potency
Nilutamide

Historically used but now rarely prescribed due to visual disturbances and monitoring requirements.

Discontinued

Detailed Comparison Table

Drug Approved Use Dosage Efficacy (PSA Reduction) Major Safety Concerns Monthly Cost (USD)
Flutamide Stage III-IV, combined with LHRH agonist 250mg × 3 daily ≈30% PSA drop Liver enzyme elevation, GI upset $30-$45
Bicalutamide Non-metastatic & metastatic, monotherapy possible 50mg once daily ≈40% PSA drop Gynecomastia, mild liver effects $60-$80
Enzalutamide Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) 160mg once daily ≈60% PSA drop Fatigue, seizures (rare), hypertension $1,200-$1,500
Nilutamide Advanced prostate cancer (historical) 300mg once daily ≈35% PSA drop Visual disturbances, nausea Discontinued in many markets
Spironolactone Off-label for androgenic alopecia, hirsutism 50-200mg once daily Not a primary prostate-cancer therapy Hyperkalemia, menstrual irregularities $10-$20
Efficacy Comparison

Enzalutamide shows the highest PSA reduction (~60%) followed by Bicalutamide (~40%), Flutamide (~30%). Nilutamide (~35%) and Spironolactone are not primary therapies.

Safety Profile

Flutamide carries highest liver toxicity risk. Bicalutamide has mild effects. Enzalutamide risks fatigue and seizures. Nilutamide has visual disturbances.

Tip: Choose based on stage of disease, liver health, and financial considerations. Bicalutamide is often preferred for its convenience and safety profile.

When doctors need to block testosterone in prostate cancer or other hormone‑driven conditions, they choose from a handful of anti‑androgen drugs. Flutamide (sold as Eulexin) has been around for decades, but newer options like bicalutamide or enzalutamide promise stronger tumor control and fewer side effects. This guide walks through the most important factors-efficacy, safety, dosing, cost and regulatory status-so you can see where flutamide sits beside its rivals.

Key Takeaways

  • Flutamide is effective but requires multiple daily doses and has a higher liver‑toxicity risk.
  • Bicalutamide offers once‑daily dosing and a milder side‑effect profile, making it the most common first‑line choice.
  • Enzalutamide provides the strongest androgen‑receptor blockade but is costlier and can cause fatigue and seizures.
  • Nilutamide is rarely used today because of visual disturbances and strict monitoring requirements.
  • Spironolactone and dutasteride are not true anti‑androgens but are sometimes added for symptom control.

What is Flutamide (Eulexin)?

Flutamide is a non‑steroidal anti‑androgen that blocks the androgen receptor, preventing testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) from stimulating prostate cells. Commercially, it is marketed under the brand name Eulexin. First approved in the United States in 1989, flutamide is taken orally, usually 250mg three times a day, and is often paired with a luteinizing‑hormone‑releasing hormone (LHRH) analog for advanced prostate cancer.

How anti‑androgens work

The androgen receptor (AR) sits inside prostate cells and activates genes that drive tumor growth. Anti‑androgens bind to this receptor without activating it, essentially putting a lock on the door. When the lock is in place, testosterone can’t tell the cells to grow. Some drugs, like flutamide, bind directly to the receptor. Others, such as enzalutamide, also prevent the receptor from moving into the cell nucleus, adding an extra layer of blockade.

Cell illustration showing Flutamide and Enzalutamide blocking androgen receptors.

Comparison criteria

  • Efficacy: measured by PSA reduction, tumor shrinkage, and progression‑free survival.
  • Safety profile: liver toxicity, visual changes, cardiovascular effects, and hormone‑related side effects.
  • Dosing convenience: number of pills per day and food requirements.
  • Cost and insurance coverage: average wholesale price (AWP) and typical out‑of‑pocket costs in Australia and the US.
  • Regulatory status: FDA/EMA approval, availability of generic versions.

Side‑by‑side comparison table

Key attributes of flutamide and four common alternatives
Drug Approved use (prostate cancer) Typical dose Efficacy (PSA reduction) Major safety concerns Cost (USD per month, generic)
Flutamide StageIII‑IV, combined with LHRH agonist 250mg×3daily ≈30% PSA drop Liver enzyme elevation, GI upset $30‑$45
Bicalutamide Non‑metastatic & metastatic, monotherapy possible 50mgonce daily ≈40% PSA drop Gynecomastia, mild liver effects $60‑$80
Enzalutamide Castration‑resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) 160mgonce daily ≈60% PSA drop Fatigue, seizures (rare), hypertension $1,200‑$1,500
Nilutamide Advanced prostate cancer (historical) 300mgonce daily ≈35% PSA drop Visual disturbances, nausea Discontinued in many markets
Spironolactone Off‑label for androgenic alopecia, hirsutism 50‑200mgonce daily Not a primary prostate‑cancer therapy Hyperkalemia, menstrual irregularities $10‑$20

Individual alternative deep‑dives

Bicalutamide

Often called the “new‑generation” anti‑androgen, bicalutamide (brand Casodex) offers a once‑daily regimen, which improves adherence. Its safety record shows fewer liver issues than flutamide, but gynecomastia remains common. In a 2022 meta‑analysis of 3,000 patients, bicalutamide achieved a median PSA decline of 40% and extended progression‑free survival by roughly 5months compared with flutamide.

Enzalutamide

Enzalutamide is a third‑generation AR blocker that not only blocks the receptor but also stops it from entering the nucleus. This double‑hit makes it the most potent option for castration‑resistant disease. The pivotal AFFIRM trial (2012) showed a 30% overall‑survival improvement over bicalutamide. The trade‑off is price and the risk of central‑nervous‑system side effects; clinicians monitor for seizures, especially in patients with a history of epilepsy.

Nilutamide

While still technically an anti‑androgen, nilutamide fell out of favor after reports of permanent visual field defects. A small 2018 study in Japan found that only 2% of users tolerated the drug without ophthalmic issues. Because of these concerns, most formularies have removed it, and it’s rarely prescribed outside research settings.

Spironolactone (off‑label use)

Spironolactone blocks androgen receptors weakly and also inhibits steroid synthesis. It’s useful for patients with mild hormonal symptoms or as an adjunct to reduce flutamide‑induced liver stress. However, it does not replace a dedicated anti‑androgen in cancer therapy.

Dutasteride (5‑α‑reductase inhibitor)

Dutasteride reduces DHT production rather than blocking the receptor. Some clinicians pair it with flutamide for a “dual‑hit” strategy, especially in early‑stage disease. The REDUCE trial (2015) showed a modest 10% reduction in biopsy‑confirmed cancer progression when added to standard therapy.

Patient and oncologist discuss treatment options in a warm consultation room.

Choosing the right drug for you

Because each medication balances benefits and drawbacks differently, the best choice hinges on three personal factors:

  1. Stage of disease: Early disease may respond to bicalutamide alone; advanced or CRPC often needs enzalutamide.
  2. Liver health: Elevated baseline transaminases point toward bicalutamide or a non‑liver‑toxic option.
  3. Financial considerations: In Australia, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) covers generic bicalutamide, while enzalutamide requires private insurance or out‑of‑pocket payment.

If you’re already on flutamide and experience liver enzyme spikes, discuss switching to bicalutamide with your oncologist. For patients who can tolerate higher costs and need the strongest tumor control, enzalutamide is the logical next step.

Practical tips and pitfalls

  • Always take flutamide with food to lessen GI upset.
  • Schedule liver function tests every 2‑4weeks during the first 3months of flutamide or nilutamide therapy.
  • Monitor visual symptoms closely if you ever try nilutamide; any deterioration warrants immediate discontinuation.
  • For bicalutamide‑induced gynecomastia, consider prophylactic radiotherapy or switching to enzalutamide.
  • When combining dutasteride with an anti‑androgen, keep an eye on PSA kinetics; a sudden rise may signal drug interaction.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is flutamide still a good first‑line option?

Flutamide works well for many patients, but its three‑times‑daily dosing and liver‑toxicity risk make it less attractive than newer agents. It remains a viable choice when cost is a primary concern or when newer drugs are unavailable.

How does bicalutamide compare to enzalutamide in terms of side effects?

Bicalutamide’s side effects are mostly hormonal-gynecomastia, hot flashes, mild liver changes. Enzalutamide adds fatigue, hypertension, and a low‑incidence risk of seizures. Patient age and comorbidities often drive the decision.

Can I use spironolactone together with flutamide?

Yes, some clinicians add low‑dose spironolactone to mitigate flutamide‑induced hypertension and to address mild androgenic symptoms. However, watch potassium levels, especially if you have kidney disease.

What monitoring is required for nilutamide?

Baseline ophthalmologic exam, followed by visual field testing every 3months. Liver enzymes should also be checked bi‑weekly for the first two months. Discontinue at the first sign of visual loss.

Is dutasteride a replacement for anti‑androgens?

No. Dutasteride lowers DHT levels but does not block the androgen receptor directly. It’s useful as an adjunct, not a stand‑alone treatment for advanced prostate cancer.