Actigraphy and Wearables: How to Track Sleep at Home Accurately

Actigraphy and Wearables: How to Track Sleep at Home Accurately

Most people think they know how much they sleep. You lie down at 11 p.m., wake up at 7 a.m. - that’s eight hours, right? But if you’ve ever woken up feeling exhausted despite a full night in bed, you’ve already seen the problem: sleep perception is wildly unreliable. That’s where actigraphy and modern wearables come in. They don’t guess. They measure. And for anyone struggling with poor sleep, insomnia, or jet lag, this data can be a game-changer.

What Is Actigraphy, Really?

Actigraphy isn’t magic. It’s science built on movement. A small device - usually worn on the wrist like a watch or ring - uses a tiny accelerometer to record every shift, twitch, and roll you make during the night. Then, software turns that movement into sleep and wake estimates. No brain scans. No electrodes stuck to your scalp. Just motion.

This isn’t new tech. It started in the 1980s at Stanford and the University of Pittsburgh, designed for sleep labs. But today, it’s in your Oura Ring, Fitbit, and Garmin. The core idea hasn’t changed: if you’re still, you’re probably asleep. If you’re moving, you’re awake. Simple. But the real power? It works for weeks, not just one night.

That’s the big difference between actigraphy and polysomnography (PSG), the gold-standard sleep study done in a lab. PSG is accurate - 95%+ - but you can’t sleep in a lab for 30 days. Actigraphy lets you track your sleep in your own bed, through workweeks, vacations, and time zone changes. It catches patterns PSG misses.

What Metrics Actually Matter?

Not all sleep data is created equal. Here’s what your wearable actually tells you, and what it means:

  • Total Sleep Duration: How many hours you spent asleep. Easy to understand. But if you’re in bed for 9 hours and only sleeping 6, that’s a problem.
  • Sleep Onset Latency: How long it takes you to fall asleep. If this is over 30 minutes regularly, it’s a red flag.
  • Sleep Efficiency: The percentage of time in bed that you’re actually asleep. Below 85% for more than a week? You’re likely experiencing insomnia.
  • Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO): How many minutes you’re awake after falling asleep. Frequent nighttime awakenings show up here.

These numbers aren’t just numbers. They tell stories. A low sleep efficiency with long WASO? You’re waking up too often. High sleep onset latency? Your brain isn’t shutting down. And if your sleep efficiency stays high but you still feel tired? That’s paradoxical insomnia - your brain thinks you’re awake, even when you’re asleep.

Consumer Wearables vs. Medical-Grade Devices

Not all devices are the same. There’s a huge gap between what you can buy at Target and what a sleep clinic uses.

Medical-grade actigraphs like the Philips Actiwatch Spectrum Plus cost $1,200-$1,800. They sample movement at 100Hz - meaning they catch every tiny shift. They’re FDA-cleared. Used by doctors. Data is analyzed with specialized software like ActivInsights’ Sleep Toolkit. These devices are built for diagnosis and long-term monitoring.

Consumer devices? Fitbit Charge 5, Oura Ring Gen 3, Garmin Vivosmart - they use similar sensors, but with less precision. Their algorithms are tuned for general wellness, not clinical accuracy. They’re great for spotting trends, but not for diagnosing sleep apnea or narcolepsy.

Here’s the trade-off:

Comparison: Consumer Wearables vs. Medical Actigraphy
Feature Consumer Wearables (e.g., Oura, Fitbit) Medical Actigraphy (e.g., Philips Actiwatch)
Accuracy (vs. PSG) 75-85% 85-90%
Duration of Monitoring Up to 7 days (battery) Up to 60 days
Sleep Stage Detection Estimates REM/deep (often wrong) No sleep stage detection
Cost $99-$299 $1,200-$1,800
Clinical Use Not approved for diagnosis Approved for insomnia and circadian disorders

Bottom line: Consumer wearables are excellent for spotting trends over time. Medical devices are for when you need answers your doctor can rely on.

A 1980s-style clinical lab with futuristic devices and a doctor analyzing a giant sleep chart.

Why Actigraphy Fails to Detect Wake Time

Here’s the biggest flaw: if you lie still while awake, the device thinks you’re asleep.

That’s called motionless wake. It’s common. You’re lying there, eyes open, mind racing - but your body isn’t moving. Actigraphy can’t tell the difference. Studies show its specificity (ability to detect true wakefulness) ranges from 27% to 80%. That’s a huge range. And it’s worse for people with insomnia, who tend to lie still longer.

That’s why some users get confused. Their tracker says they slept 7 hours, but they felt like they barely slept at all. The device isn’t lying. It’s just blind to stillness.

That’s why newer devices - like Garmin’s 2024 algorithm - now combine motion with heart rate variability and skin temperature. More data = better guesses. But even then, it’s still an estimate.

How to Use It Right: 5 Rules from Clinicians

If you’re using a wearable to understand your sleep, don’t just wear it and hope for the best. Here’s what sleep doctors actually recommend:

  1. Wear it on your non-dominant wrist. Studies show misplacement cuts accuracy by up to 22%. If you’re right-handed, wear it on your left.
  2. Wear it for at least 7-14 days straight. One night means nothing. Sleep varies. You need a pattern.
  3. Don’t remove it for more than 2 hours per day. Removing it for naps or showers? That’s fine. But if you take it off for hours, your data becomes unreliable. ActivInsights says data validity drops 18% per hour of removal.
  4. Focus on trends, not single nights. Your sleep might be 5 hours one night, 8 the next. That’s normal. Look at the 7-day average. A 30-45 minute swing day-to-day isn’t a crisis.
  5. Don’t chase perfect scores. If you start stressing because your sleep efficiency dropped to 82%, you’re falling into orthosomnia - sleep anxiety caused by tracking. That’s worse than bad sleep.

Dr. Cathy Goldstein from the University of Michigan puts it simply: “Actigraphy gives you real-world data. But it doesn’t replace the conversation with your doctor.”

Who Benefits Most?

Actigraphy isn’t for everyone. But it’s powerful for specific cases:

  • People with insomnia: Especially those who think they’re not sleeping at all. Actigraphy often shows they’re sleeping more than they believe.
  • Shift workers and frequent travelers: It tracks circadian rhythm shifts. Condor Instruments found 82% of business travelers improved their sleep scheduling after 4 weeks of use.
  • People with delayed sleep phase disorder: If you’re always falling asleep at 3 a.m. and waking at noon, actigraphy shows the pattern clearly.
  • Those being treated for sleep apnea: It helps monitor whether CPAP therapy is improving actual sleep time, not just reducing snoring.

It’s less useful for diagnosing sleep apnea itself - that still needs a breathing monitor. And it can’t tell you if you’re in REM or deep sleep with any real accuracy. But it tells you if you’re getting enough total sleep - and that’s often the real issue.

A jet flies through a starry sleep-cycle sky as passengers glow with wearable sleep data.

Privacy, Data, and the Hidden Cost

There’s another side to this. Your sleep data is personal. And most apps don’t protect it well.

Security researcher Alex Birsan found that many consumer sleep apps send raw actigraphy data without end-to-end encryption. That means your sleep patterns - when you wake, how long you sleep, even your nightly restlessness - could be stored on servers vulnerable to leaks.

And then there’s the insurance angle. In 2024, Senator Tammy Duckworth raised concerns in a Senate hearing about insurers using sleep data to adjust premiums. Right now, consumer wearables aren’t regulated like medical devices. Your sleep data isn’t protected by HIPAA. It’s just another data point in a marketing profile.

Before you buy, check: Does the company allow you to download your data? Do they sell it? Can you delete it? These questions matter more than battery life.

The Future: AI, Multimodal Sensors, and the Clinical Shift

Things are changing fast. In 2023, the NIH gave $2.8 million to a team at the University of Michigan to build AI that improves wake detection by 27%. That’s huge. If they crack motionless wake, actigraphy becomes far more reliable.

Apple’s rumored “Sleep Study” feature for the Apple Watch could combine actigraphy with audio (snoring detection), temperature, and even blood oxygen - turning your wrist into a mini sleep lab.

By 2027, the Sleep Research Society predicts 80% of primary care doctors will use actigraphy data as part of routine wellness checks. That’s not sci-fi. It’s already happening in clinics that use Philips or ActivInsights devices.

But the warning remains: technology can help. It can’t replace judgment. As Dr. Phyllis Zee says, “Quantification without context creates anxiety, not health.”

Final Take: Should You Try It?

If you’ve been told you have insomnia but feel like you’re sleeping fine - try it.

If you’re tired every day, and no one can explain why - try it.

If you travel often, work nights, or just want to understand your sleep - try it.

But don’t buy it to fix your sleep. Buy it to understand it. Use the data to start conversations - with yourself, with your partner, with your doctor. Don’t let a number dictate your worth or your rest.

Actigraphy doesn’t give you answers. It gives you questions. And sometimes, that’s exactly what you need.

Can actigraphy diagnose sleep apnea?

No. Actigraphy tracks movement and estimates sleep/wake times, but it can’t detect breathing pauses or oxygen drops - the key signs of sleep apnea. For that, you need a home sleep apnea test (HSAT) with airflow and oxygen sensors, or a full polysomnography in a lab.

Is the Oura Ring more accurate than Fitbit for sleep tracking?

For total sleep time and sleep efficiency, yes - studies show the Oura Ring matches clinical actigraphy more closely than Fitbit. But neither is perfect. Oura uses temperature and heart rate variability to improve estimates, while Fitbit relies more on motion. Both struggle with wake detection. For trends over weeks, both are useful. For clinical diagnosis, neither replaces a medical device.

How long should I wear a sleep tracker before seeing results?

At least 7-14 days. One night’s data is meaningless. Sleep varies based on stress, caffeine, alcohol, and schedule. You need a full week to see your true pattern. Most sleep specialists recommend 10-14 days to establish a reliable baseline before making any changes.

Can wearables help with jet lag?

Yes. Actigraphy tracks your body’s internal clock by measuring rest-activity patterns over days. Many frequent travelers use it to time light exposure and melatonin use. Condor Instruments’ 2023 study found 82% of business travelers improved their sleep schedule after 4 weeks of using actigraphy data to adjust their routine.

Do I need a doctor to use actigraphy?

No, you don’t need a doctor to buy or wear a consumer device. But if you’re using the data to understand a sleep problem - like chronic insomnia or daytime fatigue - you should bring it to your doctor. Medical-grade actigraphy requires interpretation by a sleep specialist. Consumer data is best used as a starting point for discussion, not a diagnosis.

Why does my sleep tracker say I slept 8 hours but I still feel exhausted?

Because sleep quality isn’t just about duration. You might have lots of wakefulness your device missed (motionless wake), or your sleep stages could be fragmented. Your body might be under stress, your breathing shallow, or your circadian rhythm off. Wearables estimate sleep, but they don’t measure how restorative it was. That’s why feeling tired despite “good” data is common - and why clinical evaluation still matters.